Today I had an apartment management 'per-inspection' for HUD inspection dated for Dec 21st 2013..There were a gang of 5 people in my apartment. The apartment manager did not courteously introduce each person by name, they just raided my house in the name of HUD 'pre-inspection'.
party in question: Two females, Three males, 1 of 3 males were the on-site manager.
The video was the condition before the inspection took place.
According to the party in question: Reasonable accommodation request is needed to have my closet doors as I please., and m iny current configuration However, when I asked them why? and please state the HUD code violation in question, so that I can accommodate the HUD code. Like Roaches, they scattered. Only on female was left to answer my question. She did so with a wink and a smile.
Management Conclusions of the HUD Pre-Inspection:
- Management requests that I put in a maintenance request to change my A/C filter
- Some blonde lady, asks me that I reinstall the closet doors for the Dec 21st HUD inspection. In addition, submit a Reasonable Accommodation Request for the closet doors.
- Of course, grease spots. In my opinion, they don't consider "reasonable wear & tear
background: last Reasonable Accommodation for Disability Request for my bunny (service animal) they DENIED me the request via formality letter.
my thoughts: if they can't state specifically site the code violation for the RAD request, their request is invalid.
How I feel: I feel that Gestapo was over this afternoon. Knit picking on irrelevant concerns.
I do not support the funding of businesses who infringe on basic inalienable rights. Obviously, the main focus of this program is not independence and self-sufficiency and if funding is the main & only concern of this subsidized housing building; I suggest that they step down from management & find other 'types' of people to use a prey, and capitalize on that.
off topic they will lease to people with criminal background. I have not heard of a VET with disabled status informed about this program. Very odd. my personal source: I have been in the company of a few VETerans the past couple weeks.
Fair Housing Act states my rights as a tenant. This Subsidized Apartment is poorly managed and many many red flags have come up during the past 4 yrs as tenant.
this is the polar opposite of Anne Sippi Clinic as mentioned in an earlier blog: http://gigglefight.blogspot.com/2012/07/anne-sippi-clinic-in-east-los-angeles-ca.html
addendum: HUD (federal) and LAHD (state) is taxpayer cha-ching. Just Food For Thought
1 comment:
Post a Comment